Parcel intelligence — Demory farm site (East Tennessee two-site)
Purpose: Parcel worksheet for SITE_FARM at Demory, Campbell County, Tennessee. Soils evidence: one Web Soil Survey Soil Map tab session is in the vault—AOI 558.6 ac in that session ≠ the ~120 ac planning label until you clip and re-run on the operating polygon.
Anchors: Demory farm site (place) · 120-acre production farm (SITE_FARM) · Demory farm — site intelligence. Package: Parcel intelligence package — East Tennessee two-site.
Authoritative capture (raw): web-soil-survey-campbell-county-aoi-soil-map-tab-capture-2026-04-18.md. Source-note: Campbell County — WSS AOI soil map tab (capture).
Location role
| Field |
Value / status |
| Named anchor |
Demory (planning label), Campbell County, TN |
| County / state |
Campbell County, Tennessee (FIPS TN013 in WSS session) |
| Planning role |
SITE_FARM — primary production surface (~120 ac scenario label) |
Acreage and site function
| Field |
Value / status |
| Planning acreage (scenario label) |
~120 ac (not a deed abstract) |
| Deed / survey acreage |
— pending evidence in raw/ + source-note |
| WSS AOI (this vault session) |
558.6 ac total in capture — must not be read as “120 ac soil mix” without clipping |
| Primary functions |
Livestock/forage/crops, field telemetry, on-site labor (see site intelligence) |
Soils
Evidence type: Web Soil Survey — Soil Map tab (HTML capture), session dated 2026-04-18 in filename.
Vault summary (session AOI — not clipped to ~120 ac)
Values below are only what appears in the Soil Map summary table in the raw capture; percent of AOI is for this 558.6 ac session, not for a deed.
| Map unit symbol |
Map unit name (WSS) |
Acres in AOI |
% of AOI |
| CaC |
Claiborne silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes |
5.2 |
0.9% |
| CaD |
Claiborne silt loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes |
0.6 |
0.1% |
| CaE |
Claiborne silt loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes |
10.2 |
1.8% |
| FbD |
Fullerton and Bodine gravelly silt loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes |
174.4 |
31.2% |
| FbF |
Fullerton and Bodine gravelly silt loams, 25 to 70 percent slopes |
309.3 |
55.4% |
| MaD |
Minvale gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes |
3.4 |
0.6% |
| TaF |
Talbott-Rock outcrop complex, 30 to 50 percent slopes |
55.5 |
9.9% |
| Total |
Totals for Area of Interest (WSS) |
558.6 |
100% |
Session warnings (in raw): Soil Map may not be valid at displayed zoom; mapping scale 1:24,000; enlargement beyond mapping scale can misrepresent line placement and small contrasting inclusions.
| Field |
Value / status |
| Map units clipped to ~120 ac operating polygon |
— pending redraw WSS AOI + new capture |
| Hydric / limiting factors |
— use Soil Data Explorer / field eval per map unit; not filled here |
Slope
From map unit names in this session (aggregate story only): dominant classes include 12–25%, 25–70%, and 30–50% complexes—see table above. Field / clipped distribution — pending.
| Field |
Value / status |
| Terrain summary |
Steep/gravelly dominant in this AOI aggregate (see site intelligence) |
| Steep-area % on ~120 ac |
— pending AOI clip |
Hydrology
| Field |
Value / status |
| Streams / ponds / wetlands (desktop) |
Streams layer appears in session imagery — riparian / TDEC rules — field + regulatory verify |
| Floodplain / karst flags |
— pending |
| Stock water / crossings |
— design problem on sloped ground; see site intelligence |
Access
| Field |
Value / status |
| Public road frontage / easements |
— pending title / field |
| Internal lanes / gates / surface |
— pending; high CAPEX on steep ground (site intelligence) |
Utilities
| Field |
Value / status |
| Electric service |
— pending utility |
| Broadband |
— pending |
| Water (well / district / ag use) |
— pending |
| Onsite sewage |
— production structures — county program context only until permits filed |
Structures
| Field |
Value / status |
| Existing ag / residential structures |
— pending |
| Planned pads |
— earthwork/sediment discipline per slope evidence |
Constraints
| Constraint |
Evidence / note |
| Terrain / soils |
FbF / FbD / TaF dominance in session AOI → fence, road, pad, and sediment constraints |
| Regulatory |
TDEC / crossings / waste stacking — not inferred from WSS alone |
| AOI vs deed |
558.6 ac session may include land outside ~120 ac operating plan |
Opportunities
| Opportunity |
Depends on |
| Grazing-led systems with water + fence right |
Clip soils to paddock polygons; field soil tests |
| Telemetry ROI |
Tank/gateway points where power and backhaul exist |
Telemetry placement candidates
| Candidate |
Power / backhaul |
Notes |
| Ridge / high points |
— candidate only |
LoRa/Meshtastic line-of-sight — verify |
| Barn / tank / pump |
— pending |
Observe-first automation (see smart-tech strategy) |
Validation tasks
Unresolved questions
- Which sub-areas of the session AOI are in the ~120 ac operating footprint?
- Deed lines vs WSS AOI boundary used for this capture?
- Per-field soil tests and carrying capacity — not in vault.